Why we shouldnt pay college athletes
School of Law who played basketball for the University of Northern Colorado from to Lastly, I think that student athletes mainly continue to play their sports at the collegiate level because competition and training become an integral part of us.
At no point did I ever think of monetary compensation; I just felt grateful for every moment I got to hold a tennis racquet, all the pain included. Moreover, only one-third of schools made a profit or broke even on their basketball programs in the school year.
College athletes should not be paid statistics
Paying student-athletes might sound like a fairer way to treat students who generate so much money and attention for their colleges not to mention the television networks that broadcast their games. Now, the powerhouses will get all the top recruits because they are able to pay top recruits a lot of money. A federal judge in Northern California, Claudia Wilken, will soon decide if student-athletes should instead be paid more like professionals. Even though there are hundreds of players on a football field, does not mean they eased their way there. I have two counters to this argument. At no point did I ever think of monetary compensation; I just felt grateful for every moment I got to hold a tennis racquet, all the pain included. The Power 5 colleges get a majority of the revenue and would have more resources to use to pay their athletes. Please Ignore Speak your mind. In fact, among the roughly athletic departments in the N. That could potentially deprive students of a chance to gain the proper education and experience at the college they attend, since their necessary program is cut. Those picked outside the top 12 have a fewer than 30 percent chance. College athletes are, after all, still students: it is unfair to place the expectations that come along with earning a salary on a student trying to pursue their education as well as their sport. The NCAA should not be discredited on one issue due to the mishandling of others. The myth of schools and the NCAA holding on to revenue without distribution is a harmful one; the fixed costs of athletic programs are aplenty, especially when it comes to modernizing facilities, providing scholarships, and paying for good recruiting for all sports.
A more in-depth analysis, however, shows that paying college athletes would disrupt the nature of college athletics. Those picked outside the top 12 have a fewer than 30 percent chance. Millions of student-athletes devote their sweat, blood and tears to sports.
Now, the powerhouses will get all the top recruits because they are able to pay top recruits a lot of money. These athletes collectively generate tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars annually for their schools.
The University of North Dakota cut five teams over the next two years to help pay for the added expense. Those who usually debate against paying college athletes say it would change the nature of college athletics.
What better than a school led by legendary coach Mike Krzyzewskiwho has led Duke to 14 ACC Championships, 12 Final Four appearances, and five National Championships, to help a young athlete emotionally and physically mature and get ready for the big leagues?
Payingcollege athletes each year will only exacerbate this debt, likely resulting in cuts to other parts of the university budget, an act which would be unfair to students in general.
based on 86 review